“All that peace man, it felt so good that
it hurt. I want to hurt it back. “
As Tim O’Brien
introduced this phrase in the chapter Spin,
I felt that he was addressing peace in a newfound interesting way. He’s saying
that when one world has a lot of peace without any conflicts whatsoever, it
hurts—meaning that peace is actually a cause of conflict. As one has too much
peace in mind, the urge for conflict surges and with a blink of an eye, they
are involved in a war that they cannot escape of. So the reason of why he says,
“ I want to hurt it back.” is because as one is tempted to conflict by too much
peace, he attacks, and what follows is the act of defense that the one attacked
inflicts on the attacker.
I feel for the soldiers; it's not their fault that the war has happened. Many of them don't even want to be there in the first place. Yet peace itself is a major conflict in war; it seems to be wrong to be peaceful in a war. Peace seems to be a luxury that nobody can afford. Peace is an oasis in the middle of a desert; yet you are chosen to go through the harshness of the desert peace seems wrong. Peace, is not defined by war, but people still think that peace in the middle of war is wrong. But if there is no war, then is there still peace? How would peace be defined then?
The soldiers, leaving behind everything--family, love and home--seem to have left the right to be at peace too. The war damages them--not one soldier, whether dead or alive, comes out of the war as a whole. They are so angry and many grieve about the lives they've taken, and intend to hurt peace itself. Should peace be blamed? Or should war be blamed?
I feel for the soldiers; it's not their fault that the war has happened. Many of them don't even want to be there in the first place. Yet peace itself is a major conflict in war; it seems to be wrong to be peaceful in a war. Peace seems to be a luxury that nobody can afford. Peace is an oasis in the middle of a desert; yet you are chosen to go through the harshness of the desert peace seems wrong. Peace, is not defined by war, but people still think that peace in the middle of war is wrong. But if there is no war, then is there still peace? How would peace be defined then?
The soldiers, leaving behind everything--family, love and home--seem to have left the right to be at peace too. The war damages them--not one soldier, whether dead or alive, comes out of the war as a whole. They are so angry and many grieve about the lives they've taken, and intend to hurt peace itself. Should peace be blamed? Or should war be blamed?